<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.0" article-type="healthcare" lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IJCRR</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">I Journ Cur Res Re</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Current Research and Review</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">I Journ Cur Res Re</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2231-2196</issn><issn pub-type="opub">0975-5241</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Open Science Publishers LLP</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">49</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-id pub-id-type="doi-url"/><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>STUDY OF CLINICAL PATTERN IN PATIENTS WITH CUTANEOUS ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS&#13;
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>K.G.</surname><given-names>Balpande</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>A.S.</surname><given-names>Borkar</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>R.T.</surname><given-names>Badwaik</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>25</day><month>05</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>34</fpage><lpage>39</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>This article is copyright of Popeye Publishing, 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>Introduction: Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (cutaneous ADRs) are most common and occur in up to 8% of the global general population and in 2-3% of hospitalized patients. Hence, the present study was undertaken to determine the clinical pattern of all cutaneous ADRs. It also emphasises on the need and importance of an effective pharmacovigilance programme. Objective: To assess the clinical pattern of cutaneous ADRs and to recognize offending drug. Method: This study was conducted in a 800 beded tertiary care hospital in central India. All patients who attended dermatology OPD were screened and patients with suspected cutaneous ADRs presented primarily or referred from other departments of the hospital during the study period were enrolled. The diagnosis of the cutaneous ADR was based on history of drug ingestion, clinical findings and exclusion of other simillar disorders and it was done by a consultant dermatologist. Results: From 1st January 2011 to 31st December 2011, 116 cases of cutaneous ADRs (64 males and 52 females) were reported. Urticaria/angioedema (32.75%) was the most frequent cutaneous ADR reported followed by maculopapular rash (27.58%), fixed drug eruption (20.68%) and photosensitivity (12.06%). Antimicrobial drugs (40.51%) were the most common offending group of drugs causing the cutaneous ADRs followed by analgesic/anti-inflammatory/antipyretics (32.75%) and antiepileptics (14.65%). Sulfonamides were the most common offending drug followed by ibuprofen among all individual drugs. Conclusion: Urticaria/angioedema was the most common cutaneous ADR seen. Sulphonamides were the most common offending agent causing cutaneous ADRs.&#13;
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>cutaneous adverse drug reactions</kwd><kwd> tertiary care hospital</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
