<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.0" article-type="healthcare" lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IJCRR</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">I Journ Cur Res Re</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Current Research and Review</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">I Journ Cur Res Re</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2231-2196</issn><issn pub-type="opub">0975-5241</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Open Science Publishers LLP</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">18</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-id pub-id-type="doi-url"/><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>IMPACT OF ADMISSION NON STRESS TEST AS A SCREENING PROCEDURE ON PERINATAL OUTCOME&#13;
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Verma</surname><given-names>Anjana</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Shrimali</surname><given-names>Lalit</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>31</day><month>01</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>6</fpage><lpage>10</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>This article is copyright of Popeye Publishing, 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>Objectives: To evaluate the role of admission non stress test as a screening method in low and high risk pregnancies and to assess the perinatal outcome. Methods: In this study 326 women with singleton term pregnancies admitted in established labour were subjected to admission stress test (AST). These women were classified into three subgroups according to result of AST: Reactive, Equivocal and Non reactive group. Perinatal outcome was evaluated in all the groups along with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the test. Results: caesarean and instrumental delivery rates for fetal distress were higher in non-reactive and equivocal group than in the reactive group. Perinatal morbidity in reactive, equivocal and non reactive groups was 4.8%, 28.94% and 55.92% respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of the test in this study were 63.63% and 93.33% respectively. Positive predictive value was 55.26%, while negative predictive value was 95.2%. Conclusion: Admission stress test can be used as a primary screening technique to pick up high risk fetuses and thus timely intervention can reduce perinatal morbidity.&#13;
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Admission stress test</kwd><kwd> perinatal morbidity</kwd><kwd> non stress test</kwd><kwd> contraction stress test</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
