<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xml><ArticleSet><Article><Journal><PublisherName>Radiance Research Academy</PublisherName><JournalTitle>International Journal of Current Research and Review</JournalTitle><PISSN>2231-2196</PISSN><EISSN>0975-5241</EISSN><Volume>04</Volume><Issue>12</Issue><IssueLanguage>English</IssueLanguage><SpecialIssue>N</SpecialIssue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year><Month>August</Month><Day>30</Day></PubDate></Journal><ArticleType>Healthcare</ArticleType><ArticleTitle>ANGIOFIBROMA TESTICULAR - A CASE REPORT&#xD;
</ArticleTitle><ArticleLanguage>English</ArticleLanguage><FirstPage>01</FirstPage><LastPage>03</LastPage><AuthorList><Author>M&#xE1;rio Maciel de Lima Junior</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> M&#xE1;rio Maciel de Lima</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> Fabiana Granja</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage></AuthorList><Affiliation>Corresponding Author: M&#xE1;rio Maciel de Lima Junior Rua Levindo In&#xE1;cio de Oliveira, 1547, Paraviana Boa Vista, RR, Brazil</Affiliation><Abstract>Cellular angiofibroma is a benign vascular neoplasm that typically arises in the paratesticular region in men and is easily confused with inguinal or scrotal hernia. We present a case of a cellular angiofibroma arising from the spermatic cord of a 51-year old Caucasian man. Postoperative period was without any complications and patient has been followed up to four years without any evidence of tumor recurrence.&#xD;
</Abstract><AbstractLanguage>English</AbstractLanguage><Keywords>Cellular angiofibroma, Paratesticular, Spermatic cord, Testicular, Tumor</Keywords><URLs><Abstract>http://ijcrr.com/abstract.php?article_id=66</Abstract><Fulltext>http://ijcrr.com/article_html.php?did=66</Fulltext></URLs></Article></ArticleSet><ArticleSet><Article><Journal><PublisherName>Radiance Research Academy</PublisherName><JournalTitle>International Journal of Current Research and Review</JournalTitle><PISSN>2231-2196</PISSN><EISSN>0975-5241</EISSN><Volume>04</Volume><Issue>12</Issue><IssueLanguage>English</IssueLanguage><SpecialIssue>N</SpecialIssue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year><Month>August</Month><Day>30</Day></PubDate></Journal><ArticleType>Healthcare</ArticleType><ArticleTitle>ALLEVIATING THE MONETARY LOAD BY SWITCHING TO GENERIC DRUGS&#xD;
&#xD;
&#xA0;&#xD;
&#xD;
&#xA0;&#xD;
</ArticleTitle><ArticleLanguage>English</ArticleLanguage><FirstPage>04</FirstPage><LastPage>07</LastPage><AuthorList><Author>M. Nasir Mohiuddin</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> Sana Afreen</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> Mir S. Adil</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> Sadiqua Anjum</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> U. Narayan Reddy</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> J. Narsing Rao</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> M. Javeedullah</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage></AuthorList><Affiliation> Mohd. Nasir Mohiuddin, Department of Paediatrics, Princess Esra Hospital, Hyderabad</Affiliation><Abstract>Aim: Generic drug is defined as the pharmaceutical product which is usually intended to be interchangeable with an innovator product or the pharmaceutical product which is manufactured without a license from the innovator company.Americans save an estimated $8 billion to $10 billion at retail pharmacies by purchasing generic drugs rather than brand drugs. Indians are restricted for the further medical management due to monetary constrains because of excess out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses to medications. Methodology: An observational study was conducted at an Indian hospital in the outpatient department of Paediatrics to evaluate the excess expenditure of money on brand drugs. Prescriptions from a total of 255 patients were included in the study to compare the cost of brand drugs to that of generic drugs. Results: The total cost of brand drugs for 250 prescriptions was found to be Rs. 52158.03, whereas the estimated cost for generic drugs was just Rs. 24738.01. Discussion: The results obtained from the present study showed that more than 50% of money could have been saved if generic drugs were prescribed by the physicians instead of brand drugs. Conclusion: Patients should discuss the possible generic drug options with their doctor and/or pharmacist to reduce their burden in terms of monetary unit.&#xD;
</Abstract><AbstractLanguage>English</AbstractLanguage><Keywords>Brand drugs, Cost saving, Generic drugs, Prescription cost</Keywords><URLs><Abstract>http://ijcrr.com/abstract.php?article_id=67</Abstract><Fulltext>http://ijcrr.com/article_html.php?did=67</Fulltext></URLs></Article></ArticleSet><ArticleSet><Article><Journal><PublisherName>Radiance Research Academy</PublisherName><JournalTitle>International Journal of Current Research and Review</JournalTitle><PISSN>2231-2196</PISSN><EISSN>0975-5241</EISSN><Volume>04</Volume><Issue>12</Issue><IssueLanguage>English</IssueLanguage><SpecialIssue>N</SpecialIssue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year><Month>August</Month><Day>30</Day></PubDate></Journal><ArticleType>Healthcare</ArticleType><ArticleTitle>EVALUATION OF URINE GRAM STAIN IN DIAGNOSING URINARY TRACT INFECTION IN CHILDREN&#xD;
</ArticleTitle><ArticleLanguage>English</ArticleLanguage><FirstPage>08</FirstPage><LastPage>11</LastPage><AuthorList><Author>Raashidha Subramanian</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> Thumjaa annamalai</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> Kathir subramaniam</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> Suresh  kirupanandhan</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> Vidhya Thangakumar</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage></AuthorList><Affiliation>Raashidha Subramanian, Department of Paeditrics, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, TN, India.</Affiliation><Abstract>Urinary tract infection is the most common of all the bacterial infection. This study was to determine the validity of rapid diagnostic tests for early detection of urinary tract infection in children. In our study 50 children aged between 1-5 years of suspected urinary tract infection were included in this study. Urine samples obtained from these children and were evaluated for urinary tract infection by urine microscopy, urine dipstick nitrite and leukocyte esterase, and urine gram stain, and the gold standard test urine culture and sensitivity. Using the gold standard test, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the other screening tests as mentioned above were determined and compared. In conclusion urine gram stain is a very sensitive and specific test for diagnosing urinary tract infection compared to other screening tests.&#xD;
</Abstract><AbstractLanguage>English</AbstractLanguage><Keywords> UTI, Bacterial infectio</Keywords><URLs><Abstract>http://ijcrr.com/abstract.php?article_id=68</Abstract><Fulltext>http://ijcrr.com/article_html.php?did=68</Fulltext></URLs></Article></ArticleSet></xml>
